I’ve always been of the “Hope for the best, prepare for the worst” kinda guy and, as a result, also big on backup plans. For instance, at 2AM last night I was thinking about…
What would I do if I lost the rig on the Islander?
And so, my “A” plan for a rig replacement is to go with a stayed junk rig not unlike Reuel Parker’s 33′ junk rig. You know, this one…
Sure, it doesn’t sport a free-standing mast but, in my mind, a stayed junk rig makes a whole lot of sense. The combination of a low COE, a beefyspar, and easily built rig translates into a more affordable and bombproof combo.
While I realize that hanging a jib on the rig is akin to heresy in the views of most junk fan boys/girls but here in Parker’s design it makes all kinds of sense. Then again, I don’t share the foresail phobia that seems to be so popular among those of the Junkish persuasion.
So, in the event of losing the mast I now have both plans for jerry-rigging to get me where I’m sailing towards and at least a plan of how to replace the rig on a budget if the need arises.
I had a short pole mast held up with only 2 shrouds and a fore-stay which cost less than $100 to set up. It wouldnt win any races, but it got us down to the Med from the UK before another winter trapped us.
My Nordic Folkboat also had only 3 stays required, the backstay on a tackle was only required for mast bending/ mainsail shaping.
Simple is good. High efficency (however you describe it), often comes with great complication and cost.